The day is saved ... or not
Apparently we have saved the day ... 40% of sick days SHOULD fall on Monday or Friday, which means that employees are not abusing the system.
But wait. What if next year, the evil pointy-haired boss finds that 42% of sick days fell on Monday or Friday? Proof positive, in his view, that employees are out to get him.
Let's be Dilbert for a minute. How could we confirm or disprove the evil pointy-haired boss' claim? Clearly 42% is more than 40% -- but how much is too much? Do the extra 2% just represent the natural "slop" around 40%?
Or, what if next year 90% of sick days fell on Monday or Friday? Would that make you think that Dilbert was wrong, and sick-days were not random? What about 50% of sick days on Monday or Friday?
When you use statistics, you can do one of two things. First, where your data is fairly definitive, you can calculate a numerical score that simply confirms common sense. Secondly (and more interestingly), when your data falls into a 'grey area', statistics can allow you to make a decision one way or the other. Accordingly, what we expect out of statistics is the following:
- If 40.1% of sick days are Monday or Friday: statistics confirms that this most likely fits the random sick day model (not a grey area).
- If 50% of sick days are Monday or Friday: statistics helps me to make a decision about this "grey" area.
- If 90% of sick days are Monday or Friday: statistics confirms that this most likely doesn't fit the random sick day model (not a grey area).
Copyright University of Maryland, 2007
You may link to this site for educational purposes.
Please do not copy without permission
requests/questions/feedback email: mathbench@umd.edu