The day is saved ... or not
Apparently we have saved the day ... 40% of sick days SHOULD fall on Monday or Friday, which means that employees are not abusing the system.
But wait. What if next year, Evil Pointy-Haired Boss (EPHB) finds that 42% sick days fell on Monday or Friday??? Proof positive, in his view, that employees are out to get him.
Let's be Dilbert for a minute. How could we confirm or disprove Evil Pointy-Haired Boss (EPHB's) claim? Clearly 42% is more than 40% -- but how much is too much? Do the extra 2% just represent the natural "slop" around 40%?
Or, what if next year 90% of sickdays fell on Monday or Friday? Would that make you think that Dilbert was wrong, and sick-days were not random? What about 50% of sickdays on M/F?
When you do statistics, you are doing two things: first, putting numbers on common sense, and secondly, using a method that allows you to decide on the gray areas. So, what we expect out of statistics is the following:
- if 40.1% of sickdays are M/F: statistics tells me this fits the random sickday model
- if 50% of sickdays are M/F: statistics allows me to make a decision about this "gray" area
- if 90% of sickdays are M/F: statistics tells me this does not fit the random sickday model
Copyright University of Maryland, 2007
You may link to this site for educational purposes.
Please do not copy without permission
requests/questions/feedback email: email@example.com